Die Great Barrington-Erklärung

Die MNB schadet täglich die psychosomatische Gesundheit von Millionen von Bürger*innen in Deutschland. Aus diesen Gründen: Die Angst vor einer Bedrohung (Ansteckung) durch das Virus wird durch das Tragen der Maske realisiert (unbewusst, teilbewusst, bewusst), auch dann wenn die Menschen andere Maskierte beobachten. Das löst beim Individuum (unbewusst, teilbewusst und bewusst) je nach Individueller psychologischen Bodenbeschaffenheit mehr oder weniger STRESS aus. Dieser Prozess läuft bei jedem Individuum hinsichtlich der Intensität der Bedrohungswahrnehmung sozialisationsbedingt anders. Die Maske verhindert einerseits, dass die Menschen unbeschwert und frei atmen zu können und anderseits beeinträchtigt sie die Kommunikation der Menschen untereinander. Durch die Bewegungen der Gesichtsmuskulatur (die Mimik) werden viele Signale versendet und wahrgenommen. Darüber hinaus werden auch verbale und paraverbale Kommunikation beim Tragen einer MNB negativ beeinflusst.

Great Barrington Declaration: don’t fall into the trap

The three authors of the petition, Jay Bhattacharya (Stanford, researches demographics and economics of health and aging as well as vulnerable population groups), Sunetra Gupta (professor of epidemiology at Oxford, vaccine developer) and Martin Kulldorff (Harvard, the USA advising on drug safety and risk management issues), offer us a delicious sweet dessert – which we shouldn’t eat.

Everything that matters is missing. The so-called Great Barrington Declaration says nothing about the unscientific nature of the PCR tests, which erode civil rights, is silent on the erosion of civil rights and the antisociality of social distancing, and avoids the word mask like a cat avoids water.

Not a word about the total surveillance state in the name of disease control, about contact tracing.

And perhaps the greatest scandal in medical history, the planned mass vaccinations with possibly the most severe autoimmune reactions, with carcinogenic illness or genetically irreparable damages caused by the new mRNA vaccines, is not rejected by the Great Barrington Declaration.

Bhattacharya, Gupta and Kulldorff want to seal off nursing homes and hospitals from the outside world by compulsory tests; anyone who is test-positive or refuses to take the test cannot get in. Anyone who is not continuously tested, maybe soon also anyone who is not vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, should not be allowed to work there (which then probably also will apply to schools and advisory offices, for professional customer contact at all). Mandatory vaccination through the back door.

As a Trojan horse, the term vaccination is smuggled three times into the declaration. First. Without demanding that children be protected from any DNA or RNA-based vaccine or vector vaccine, such as those used against coronaviruses, one cries a little about „lower vaccination rates in children“. Secondly, the three authors pretend acting human and thinking about poor people (of the „underprivileged“), but had already put in front: „Maintaining these measures until a vaccine is available“. Third, according to the motto nothing has to be, everything is possible: „Herd immunity (…) can be supported by a vaccine, but does not depend on it“.

„Focused protection“ names the manifesto of the three mask understanders, test propagators and vaccination friends as a concept. “Those who are not in need of protection should immediately be able to lead a normal life again”, which demigod in white will make a judgment tomorrow about whether the individual is allowed to lead “a normal life”?

Critics of the measures against COVID-19, that have been imposed on us for seven months without a scientific basis, should not sign the Great Barrington Declaration.